Towards the end of last term, four debaters went up to the palatial mansion that is the URF studio to have a live debate on air, on the motion: “This house would ban the showing of Hostel-style slasher films in cinemas.” It was pretty much an excuse for us to talk about porn and people cutting off their own ankles, but we must have done something right because we have been invited to have a regular debating slot every fortnight, starting  next term. If anyone would like to take part in a radio debate, please do get in touch!

For those of you who missed the Hostel debate, you can download a copy of your very own, which you can treasure and listen to every evening for the rest of your life, here.

http://urfonline.com/

]]> http://usds.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/usds-does-aural/feed/ 0 usds University Radio Falmer http://usds.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/finding-the-time/ http://usds.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/finding-the-time/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:03:08 +0000 usds http://usds.wordpress.com/?p=188 ]]>

Apologies for the lack of recent posts. It’s been mega-busy round here!

What with all the mulled wine, the mince pies, and not forgetting… the debates!

If you think you have something interesting to say and want to blog for this site, please  email us at the usual address (we’d love to hear from you).

I was interested to read that over in the states, the Supreme Court is currently toiling over the rights of people to say ‘Shit’ and ‘Fuck’ on television. And the hearing is just getting to the good part: the part where all the lawyers will have to use said swears over and over in the august chambers to make their points. It’s going to sound like Gordon Ramsay’s kitchen down there – only uttered by erudite barristers whose education costs are triple your net worth.

Giggles aside, it does raise an important point. Amongst adults, it could be argued that a well-placed profanity or two only brings a degree a flair to proceedings. If it helps your case, why not?

Wow… I didn’t see this one coming. There’s a new show on Dave, and it’s bringing debating to the masses. That’s right, some of our nation’s favourite standups (the first show features Dara O’Brien and Marcus Brigstocke, both political ranters of the highest order) are having at it, debate style. It may not be  British Parliamentary, but it’s not far off either. I’d call it educational if it wasn’t so darned funny.

Honestly, the stuff John Sargeant has these guys doing is just like a good USDS Debate workshop. Quick debates off the cuff? Check. Constant switchover between prop and opp, until your head is practically spinning? Check. The only thing we’ve not done is a picture round – and in fairness it’s probably the hardest routine on the show to pull off. But is that any excuse, Mark Watson, for confusing a walrus with a mammoth..?

Motions from week 1 were, ‘Politics is a waste of time’, ‘Eating meat is wrong’, ‘Britain should be more like America’ and ‘Simon Cowell is the greatest living Englishman’ (by far the most provocative of them all). Do yourself a favour and tune in to the next show, Mondays at 9:40pm.

Dear fellow debaters,

If you’ve enjoyed our first few meetings, there is an event coming a week Saturday and Sunday (1st to 2nd November) which might be for you.

The Battle of Ideas festival is a weekend dedicated to debating, with over 70 public debates bringing together hundreds of the UK’s top journalists and public figures to debate exciting motions. Just like our society debates, everyone is encouraged to put their hands up and express their point of view. It takes place in the (frankly glamorous) Royal College of Art in London, which is easily accessible by tube from Victoria. You can attend one day or both, depending on your whim.

Basically, if you love debating this weekend is the equivalent of Glastonbury or V-festival for music fans. Highlights are likely to be, ‘The Battle for Truth’, a debate exploring whether or not there is absolute truth (or are science and art equally valid?), ‘Immigration: the more the scarier?’, which will debate the need for immigration controls against the right to move freely across borders, ‘The credit crunch demystified’, and ‘What is China Thinking?’.

If this all sounds good, you need to act fast to secure a ticket. As a student you can attend the whole weekend for £25, but I am advised these tickets will soon run out. See the website for ticket options. If we can get enough of us together, you will also save on transport as we can get group-save train tickets from Brighton to Victoria. If you want any advice or have questions, you can call me on 07500807072.

Hopefully see you then,
Matt

www.battleofideas.org.uk

"That's not what his Mama said.."

Open call to everyone:

Watch yesterday’s American Presidential Debate, October 7th. (LINK 1, LINK 2)

Be a debate judge and write your opinion about who had stronger arguments and evidence and who ultimately won the debate!

Send your expert opinions to debating@ussu.sussex.ac.uk.

Lord knows I’ve never been that interested in the economy. I’ve never intentionally bought the FT, never given the concept of ‘liquid capital’ much thought beyond the contents of my last paycheque, and certainly never spoken about it at any dinner parties (unless intentionally mock-snubbing someone). Yet since the beginning of summer 2008, everyone I’ve met has suddenly become a expert on this exceedingly dull subject. Primetime news stories have taught us all what derivatives are, what hedge fund managers do for a living and even the meaning of dubious terms like stagflation. So what are we all doing with this knowledge?

Misery on Wall Street

Two things, it appears to me: first, worrying a great deal more about the things that are (and always were) largely out of our control, being the hoi polloi average taxpayer. And second, placing blame wherever it damn well suits us. ‘Kill the stockbrokers!’ I hear them cry, ‘they got us into this mess!’. Well, this may be partly true, and it is hard to sympathise with people whose bonuses outstrip the combined salary of an entire primary school, but let’s exercise caution before bringing out the pitchforks. As a wise, green man once explained, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate… (ok, I’ll stop there).

What annoys me is this. People seem to miss, in their red haze of anger towards the moneymakers, is that they do precisely that – they make money. They do not simply steal it from the poor, splice it ten different ways then hide it in offshore savings accounts. That would be too easy. No, financiers do a tough job, day in day out, that most of us comprehensively lack the skill or guile to do. And while I may covet their bespoke suits and their beemers now and then, it would be no more than schadenfreude for me to suggest that a deep recession is some grand Robin Hood scenario which would put things right again. Yet at the very prospect of this, the anticapitalist tribes on campus and beyond are practically wetting themselves with anticipation.

Take as an example the grand, myopic ease with which the American public chose on September 23 to satisfy vengeance over reason. In the near-unanimous rejection of President Bush’s proposed $700bn bailout, we saw a thoroughly sensible scheme, brave by American standards, failing simply because the majority of lawmakers feared their own re-election this coming fall. Their constituents were angry, and weren’t afraid to say it. But what it comes down to is this: if we don’t save the banks, and the world economy falters, we are all equally screwed. There will be no ‘ha ha’ moment when we get to rejoice at the princes who have become paupers and the last shall not, Biblically speaking, de facto become the first. We will all simply be, altogether, much, much poorer than before.

So let us do what needs to be done. This is no time to ditch capitalism, or jump nostalgically at the chance of creating another dark age (a favourite of the increasingly backward green lobby). Because in the end, it doesn’t matter to me that my Mars Bar will eventually cost £10,000. Or even that the bankers get their comeuppance, particularly. What matters to me is that we get through this thing in one piece – something that more actions taken through mere spite cannot achieve. Then maybe, if we’re very lucky, I can start worrying about repaying my student loan again.